Socialist Project - home

The   B u l l e t

Socialist Project • E-Bulletin No. 807
April 18, 2013

Socialist Project - home

The NDP Convention:

The Decline and Fall of an Old Preamble
(or A Social Democratic Party Becalmed)[1]

Murray Cooke

Like the federal Liberal Party leadership race, the NDP policy convention this past weekend proved to be rather anti-climactic. Any expectations (or hopes) for a divisive, soul-searching, battle royale over the identity of the NDP fell flat. With minimal debate and a decisive vote of 960 to 188, delegates approved a new preamble to the party's constitution based in part on Jack Layton's final message to Canadians and removed forward looking references to “democratic socialism” and “social ownership.” Instead, the new preamble lists the “social democratic and democratic socialist traditions” as part of the party's heritage and calls for “a rules based economy” (for both the old and new preambles, see the end of this article).

[Mike Constable, click on image to see larger picture.]

Despite the change, it would be hard to suggest that the NDP is a different kind of party after this weekend's convention. The NDP was not a socialist party on Friday morning when the convention opened. To state the obvious, the provincial NDP governments led by Darrell Dexter and Greg Selinger are not socialist governments. Despite any forthcoming moments of hysteria from the BC mass media, capitalist class or competing parties, Adrian Dix is not promising a socialist transformation of the provincial economy.

Looking back, it's laughable to describe the governments led by Gary Doer, Roy Romanow, Mike Harcourt or Bob Rae as ‘socialist.’ More fundamentally, does any serious person really think that the NDP under Jack Layton was a ‘socialist’ party?

A Long History of CCF-NDP Modernization

This was not a so-called Clause IV moment. In 1995, the British Labour Party, under Tony Blair, amended its constitution to remove the Clause IV reference to the goal of “the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange.” This wording dated back to 1918 and party members had beaten back the previous attempt in 1959-60 to amend Clause IV. Blair's success in 1995 was clearly a significant step in the transformation of Labour into a “Third Way” party, distinct from post-war social democracy.

The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) (the precursor to the NDP), actually had its own Clause IV moment way back in 1956, when it replaced its Regina Manifesto of 1933 and its stirring declaration that “No CCF government will rest content until it has eradicated capitalism and put into operation the full programme of socialized planning which will lead to the establishment in Canada of the Cooperative Commonwealth.” By the 1950s, CCF leader MJ Coldwell considered the Regina Manifesto and such rhetoric to be a “millstone around the party's neck.” Unlike the British Labour Party leadership that tried unsuccessfully to moderate Clause IV, the CCF issued a much more moderate Winnipeg Declaration.

The NDP has periodically redefined itself ever since. There were notable new NDP statements and self-definitions in 1961, 1969, 1983 and 1995. Heading into last weekend's convention, the existing preamble to the party's constitution hardly carried the symbolic or emotional weight of Labour's Clause IV or the CCF's Regina Manifesto.

The Social Democratic Legacy

By the time the CCF was transformed into the NDP in 1961, the party had clearly come to accept the broad parameters of a capitalist economy, but with an activist Keynesian fiscal policy, some elements of public ownership in a mixed economy, an institutionalized collective bargaining regime that facilitated the growth of moderate trade unions, and strong support for social programs such as public healthcare, pensions, unemployment insurance and social assistance.

In other words, the NDP from its beginning, under the federal leadership of Tommy Douglas (1961-1971), was a social democratic party. Just to be clear, I'm not using the term social democracy in some sectarian sense as an epithet. Hell, in this political climate, social democracy sounds pretty good, even radical. Historically, when the CCF-NDP said they wanted to reform capitalism, they meant it. But it has to be acknowledged that this social democratic agenda was never anti-capitalist or socialist in the sense of building a society beyond capitalism.

What Does the NDP Stand For?

The real crux of the matter is that since the end of the postwar boom in the mid-1970s and the onset of the neoliberal capitalist offensive soon after there has been less and less room for social reforms within capitalism. Forces on the Left have been on the defensive trying to retain historic victories and existing social programs.

Where there have been important victories, such as the increasing recognition of queer rights, these have been under the rubric of expanded liberal freedom and individualism within capitalism, rather than against capitalism. Struggles for equality within capitalism must continue to be waged and they demonstrate that some reforms and victories are possible. These issues remain quite central to the NDP even if there have been significant bumps in the past.

In this contemporary context, it actually would have been much more useful for the NDP to be seriously debating “social democracy” rather than “socialism” at its 2013 policy convention. Again, I don't say that to be glib. What political and fiscal room is there for reforms under contemporary capitalism? How exactly, in an era of neoliberal dominance and an ongoing global economic crisis, do New Democrats propose to achieve, in the words of the new preamble, “a country of greater equality, justice, and ... sustainable prosperity?” The answers to these questions are far from clear and the NDP hasn't even attempted to seriously address them. The reality is that under Mulcair the NDP has continued to drift to the right.

The Decline of Socialism Inside and Outside the NDP

Perhaps the real story of the NDP's new preamble is that it was passed so easily with relatively little mobilization against it. The opposition was weak. The Socialist Caucus and Fightback are tiny groups within the NDP and were unable to mobilize wider opposition to the changes. There are other socialists within the NDP but they are unorganized and, at this convention, seemed fewer in number than in the past.

Historically, left-wing challenges within the party – such as the Waffle Manifesto in 1969, the New Politics Initiative in 2001 and the leadership campaigns of Jim Laxer, Rosemary Brown and Svend Robinson – were able to generate support from 35 per cent or more of the delegates. The much smaller opposition to these changes to the party's constitution, comprising just over 16 per cent of the delegates, is significant.

Clearly, many members of the NDP and delegates to convention felt defensive about the language of the preamble and feared partisan and media attacks about ‘socialism.’ There is a clear recognition that the NDP stands a chance to win the next federal election and the membership, as a whole, is willing to modernize the party's language in order to maximize the party's electoral chances.

Realistically, some socialists in and around the NDP will be less likely to volunteer for or even vote for the NDP in the next federal election. That said, the greatest mobilizing force for New Democrats will continue to be Stephen Harper and his Conservative government.

It's probably safe to say that the new preamble to the NDP's constitution is a more accurate and honest description of the party's ideology and approach to politics than the old one.

Let's be honest too. Amid the wreckage of neoliberal globalization and the economic crisis, it's not as if there are thriving or growing socialist organizations outside of the NDP either. That is the larger and more daunting political reality that we face. •

Murray Cooke is a member of CUPE Local 3903, the Greater Toronto Workers' Assembly and the New Democratic Party. Back in 2001, he was a delegate to the federal NDP convention, thanks to the Socialist Caucus, and voted for the New Politics Initiative resolution. This article was first published on the New Socialist website.

Endnotes:

1. This title pays homage to classic writings on modernization and moderation of the CCF-NDP, including Michael S. Cross, The Decline and Fall of a Good Idea (1974) and Leo Zakuta, A Protest Movement Becalmed (1964). More obliquely it also refers to the “movement to party” thesis presented by Walter Young in his Anatomy of a Party (1969).

The Old Preamble to the NDP Constitution

The New Democratic Party believes that the social, economic and political progress of Canada can be assured only by the application of democratic socialist principles to government and the administration of public affairs.

The principles of democratic socialism can be defined briefly as:

That the production and distribution of goods and services shall be directed to meeting the social and individual needs of people within a sustainable environment and economy and not to the making of profit;

To modify and control the operations of the monopolistic productive and distributive organizations through economic and social planning. Toward these ends and where necessary the extension of the principle of social ownership;

The New Democratic Party holds firm to the belief that the dignity and freedom of the individual is a basic right that must be maintained and extended; and

The New Democratic Party is proud to be associated with the democratic socialist parties of the world and to share the struggle for peace, international co-operation and the abolition of poverty.

The Newly Amended Preamble
to the NDP Constitution

Canada is a great country, one of the hopes of the world. New Democrats are Canadians who believe we can be a better one - a country of greater equality, justice, and opportunity. We can build sustainable prosperity, and a society that shares its benefits more fairly. We can look after our seniors. We can offer better futures for our children. We can do our part to save the world's environment. New Democrats work together to these ends for the sake of our fellow citizens and in the interests of all of humanity.

New Democrats are proud of our political and activist heritage, and our long record of visionary, practical, and successful governments. That heritage and that record have distinguished and inspired our party since the creation of the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation in 1933, and the founding of the New Democratic Party in 1961.

New Democrats seek a future which brings together the best of the insights and objectives of Canadians who, within the social democratic and democratic socialist traditions, have worked through farmer, labour, co-operative, feminist, human rights and environmental movements, First Nations, M├ętis and Inuit peoples, to build a more just, equal, and sustainable Canada within a global community dedicated to the same goals.

New Democrats celebrate Canada's diversity and the deep histories, traditions and aspirations of all of its peoples. New Democrats believe in an intercultural integration model based on solidarity and harmonious exchanges among individuals of differing cultures.

New Democrats believe in freedom and democracy, and in a positive role for democratically elected and accountable Parliaments, legislatures and the governments responsible to them.

New Democrats affirm a role for government in helping to create the conditions for sustainable prosperity. We believe in a rules based economy, nationally and globally, in which governments have the power to address the limitations of the market in addressing the common good, by having the power to act in the public interest, for social and economic justice, and for the integrity of the environment.

New Democrats belong to the family of other progressive democratic political parties that govern successfully in many countries around the world. In co-operation with like minded political parties and governments, New Democrats are committed to working together for peace, international co-operation, and the common good of all - the common good being our fundamental purpose as a movement and as a party.

Comments

#7 Lynda Lange 2013-04-26 12:08 EDT
rules-based economy
The goal of a rule-based economy, as stated in the new preamble (below), is the only sane approach to better governance at present. One should not be either for or against social ownership as a matter of principle. For some things social ownership is clearly the best way -- roads and bridges, clean drinking water, public health care, and other things. For other things, especially the commodities we want and need to live and enjoy life, private enterprise can be best. But not private enterprise doing whatever it wants, but limited by government rules like decent minimum wages, safe working conditions, reasonable tax payments, etc. Private investors do not need maximum freedom to prosper -- that's just their propaganda to maximize profits. What they need is stability and predictability about the "rules". Profit may be somewhat less, but it is still there and it will be pursued. To think we either could, or should, eliminate that motive is just to deny the reality of history.

THE RULES-BASED ECONOMY: "New Democrats affirm a role for government in helping to create the conditions for sustainable prosperity. We believe in a rules based economy, nationally and globally, in which governments have the power to address the limitations of the market in addressing the common good, by having the power to act in the public interest, for social and economic justice, and for the integrity of the environment."



#6 Anonymous 2013-04-22 20:56 EDT
Kind of different Party?
I hope this change does not make the NDP irrelevant in Canadian society, we need something new in Canada, we need to be reborn, the Canadian society need something truly that respond to the necesities of our society, to make Canadians believe in the NDP, I hope this is not a facial change, a make up because Canadians know what they want, Canadians want a Party that represents Canadian interests; beat poverty, democracy, not the kind of the Harper Government. Made any changes but make this changes realy true in benefit of our society here and around the world. We need a goverment for the people, if you do not want to call that, don't do it but I hope again that this change are for the good of our society.



#5 John 2013-04-21 23:46 EDT

Many of us long time socialists long ago (or recently in my case) left the NDP. That is the most simple and obvious reason why this motion passed so easily. The folks in the NDP these days believe in only one thing: power. I don't blame them but when the winds of change come blowing with the economic crisis they will be completely ill-prepared, as were their brothers and sisters in Europe. Many people want to believe in something else. Many people want hope and someone to show them a way to a better world. Eventually the NDP and Liberals will merge (perhaps very soon as Trudeau walks all over Mulcair) and then it will be time for a version of Quebec Solidaire in the rest of the country.



#4 Anonymous 2013-04-19 00:28 EDT
boosterism
Tired twaddle like "Canada is a great country ..." makes me think the Chamber of Commerce wrote this preamble.

As for alternatives, Elizabeth May regularly takes progressive positions. But it's far from clear that the Green Party is as progressive as its leader.



#3 Anonymous 2013-04-18 13:47 EDT
re: abolition of poverty
The point regarding "abolition of poverty" is found at the end of the old preamble (see above). The new preamble does *not* include the phrase, so they nixed that too. Thanks Pat Martin!



#2 Anonymous 2013-04-18 12:05 EDT
"abolition of poverty" ?
Can someone help me with some information please.... A Toronto Star article a few days before the Convention referenced that in addition to the suggested preamble changes, another proposed change involved removing wording around "abolition of poverty" was being considered. Where was that to be found? Did it happen, or did it fall victim to the premature calling of the question? SL



#1 mike ma 2013-04-18 11:27 EDT
Murray Cooke is right
I think Murray Cooke is right. Given the absence of "growing socialist organizations outside of the NDP" we are left with very little to support or encourage (on a federal level). So what is to be done? Support the new more honest preamble and the reality of what the party currently stands for? Or seek alternatives that oftentimes leads to more marginal spaces and outcomes? Dunno. Not much of a choice... as the spirit of Murray's article already points out.



Comments are now closed.

« Previous
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(((( The   B u l l e t ))))~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
• ISSN 1923-7871 •
Next »

 
Share: Delicious  Digg  Facebook  Google bookmark  MySpace  Reddit  StumbleUpon  Twitter  UnionBook  RSS
 

 
 
^ Back to Top ^